Neither answer is right for every agency. The question is which model matches your operational situation — specifically, whether you have the staff capacity to operate every module of a traditional platform effectively, or whether you need the work delivered without that capacity requirement.
When Netsmart (myUnity Home Care) makes more sense
If your team has the specialist capacity to use it fully.
Netsmart is the right choice for agencies that have the clinical and operational staff to operate a full-stack enterprise platform — dedicated billers, clinical documentation specialists, and scheduling coordinators who are trained on the system and have time to use it fully.
When CareBravo makes more sense
If you need the work delivered, not the tools to produce it.
CareBravo is the right choice for Medicaid home care agencies that need the operational outputs Netsmart would produce but don't have the specialist staff to operate Netsmart's modules effectively. The transition concern Denise has — a platform switch that disrupts billing for three months — is addressed directly by CareBravo's Parallel Promise.
What Denise or Jackie would say about this: Denise's transition fear is real. She's been through a bad EVV switch. The Parallel Promise — CareBravo runs alongside your existing system until you've validated the output on your real data — is specifically built for operators who've been burned before.
100+ agencies. 73% average revenue growth. No added back-office hires. The agencies that chose CareBravo did so because they needed the operational output, not because CareBravo won a features comparison. The decision starts with whether your team has the capacity to run a traditional platform effectively — and what it costs when they don't.